remove_hyperlink

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that the cell value and formatting are preserved, which is a key behavioral trait. However, it does not mention potential side effects, permissions, or error conditions, so it's not fully transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, complete sentence that conveys the essential information without unnecessary words. It is well-structured and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool, the description covers the main purpose and behavior. However, it lacks parameter explanations, which would be expected for full completeness. It is minimally viable for an agent familiar with the sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not explain the parameters. 'session_id' and 'cell' are not elaborated, leaving the agent to infer their meaning from context or name alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('remove the hyperlink') and the resource ('from a cell'). It also mentions what stays unchanged (value and formatting), which distinguishes it from other operations like 'clear_range' that would remove content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a hyperlink needs to be removed while preserving cell content, but it does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool versus alternatives like 'clear_range' or 'set_hyperlink'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.