import_csv

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears the full burden. It discloses key behavioral traits such as overwriting existing cells and the effect of detect_types on numeric fields. However, it does not mention error handling, file path requirements, or whether the sheet must exist.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with two sentences, front-loading the purpose. It avoids unnecessary detail, though the second sentence could be more structured for readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It fails to mention prerequisites like an open session, file accessibility, or whether a new sheet is created. The lack of these details reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, meaning the description does not elaborate on individual parameters beyond the schema. While start_cell and detect_types are mentioned implicitly, parameters like encoding, delimiter, session_id, csv_path, and sheet are left unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Import a CSV file into a sheet, starting at start_cell.' This is a specific verb+resource combination that distinguishes it from siblings like export_csv (export) and read_range (read).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides some usage context (detect_types behavior, overwriting), but no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance relative to alternatives. The behavior around detect_types is explained, but broader usage scenarios are not addressed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.