Skip to main content
Glama
OOBE-PROTOCOL

SAP MCP Server

Get SNS Record

sap_sns_get_record
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieves a specific SNS record value (e.g., SOL, TXT, Url) for a given .sol domain using the Bonfida SDK.

Instructions

Fetch a single SNS record value for a .sol domain using the Bonfida SDK.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainNoThe .sol domain name to fetch a record from
recordTypeNoThe SNS record type to fetch (e.g. SOL, TXT, Url, IPFS, ETH, BTC, etc.)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
contentYesMCP content blocks returned to the caller.
isErrorNoTrue when the tool result represents an application-level error.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds that it uses the Bonfida SDK but does not disclose error handling or rate limits. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, 14 words, with no unnecessary information. Extremely concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (2 params, output schema exists), the description covers the essential purpose. Could mention error scenarios but output schema likely handles return format. Adequate overall.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and both parameters have descriptions. The description does not add additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Fetch', the resource 'single SNS record value', and the context '.sol domain using the Bonfida SDK'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sap_sns_get_domain_records and sap_sns_get_record_pda.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for fetching a single record but does not explicitly provide when to use vs alternatives or exclude cases. No comparison with other SNS tools is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OOBE-PROTOCOL/sap-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server