das_getAsset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not state that the operation is read-only, nor does it mention any side effects, authentication requirements, or rate limits. The description is insufficient for a tool with no annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 8 words, conveying the essential purpose without unnecessary length. It is optimally concise and front-loaded with the key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the tool has only one parameter and a simple purpose, the description does not explain what 'detailed information' includes, nor does it mention the output format or error scenarios. Given the lack of output schema, this omission leaves the agent underinformed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage for the single parameter 'id' is 100% with a clear description ('Asset mint address'). The tool description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so it scores the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'detailed information about a single NFT/asset', and the method 'via DAS'. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like das_getAssetsByOwner or das_searchAssets by specifying that it retrieves information for a single asset.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool over its siblings, such as das_getAssetsByOwner, das_getAssetsByCollection, or das_searchAssets. There is no mention of prerequisites, alternatives, or use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.