3land_listForSale

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full burden for behavioral disclosure, but it only states the action ('list an NFT for sale') without explaining side effects (e.g., on-chain transaction, approval requirements, fees, or success/failure conditions). The minimal depth leaves the agent uninformed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. It efficiently conveys the core purpose, earning a high score for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It omits crucial context such as what happens after listing (transaction outcomes), prerequisites (e.g., ownership, approvals), or error states, leaving the agent with incomplete information for safe invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds value by clarifying that 'priceMint' refers to any SPL token (schema description incorrectly says 'NFT mint address'), but does not elaborate further on other parameters like 'expiry' or 'seller' beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists an NFT for sale on 3.Land in any SPL token. It uses a specific verb ('List') and resource ('NFT'), and the platform name distinguishes it from sibling tools like '3land_buyNFT' and '3land_cancelListing'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., '3land_mintAndList' for simultaneous minting and listing, or '3land_cancelListing' to remove a listing). No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.