sap_skills_bundle

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden. It indicates a read operation returning JSON, but does not disclose potential costs, auth requirements, or edge cases like empty bundles. It is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Efficiently conveys the core function.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite a simple purpose, the tool has two undocumented parameters and no output schema. The description does not specify the JSON structure or parameter behavior, which is insufficient for an agent to accurately invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either 'skills' or 'includeContents' parameters. The agent cannot infer parameter meanings from the description, making this a significant gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns bundled SAP MCP skills as JSON, with a specific verb 'Return' and resource 'bundled SAP MCP skills'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like sap_skills_list and sap_skills_install by focusing on the bundle retrieval for loading/writing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when an agent needs to load or write skills programmatically. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when not to use it or comparisons to alternatives like sap_skills_list, though the context makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.