sap_fetch_session
Fetch a session ledger by providing its session PDA.
Instructions
Fetch a session ledger by session PDA.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionPda | No | Session PDA (base58) to fetch the ledger for |
Fetch a session ledger by providing its session PDA.
Fetch a session ledger by session PDA.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionPda | No | Session PDA (base58) to fetch the ledger for |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should convey behavioral aspects. It only states the action without disclosing read-only nature, error handling, return format, or side effects. The brief phrase 'fetch by session PDA' offers minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler. Front-loaded with the verb 'Fetch'. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite being a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description fails to explain what a 'session ledger' is or what the result looks like. The agent lacks context about return format or potential errors.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%; the parameter 'sessionPda' is described in the schema. The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's description. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Fetch a session ledger by session PDA,' using a specific verb ('Fetch') and resource ('session ledger'). It distinguishes from sibling fetch tools like 'sap_fetch_attestation' or 'sap_fetch_escrow' by specifying the object type.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidance is provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., other fetch tools), nor does it mention prerequisites or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OOBE-PROTOCOL/sap-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server