jupiter_executeOrder

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only states execution and status without disclosing side effects, reversibility, or authorization needs. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One front-loaded sentence with no waste. Could be improved with structured prerequisites or output hints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema; description mentions 'execution status' but not its format. Adequate for a simple tool but lacks detail on return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema already provides descriptions for both parameters (requestId, signedTransaction). The description adds no extra meaning; baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool executes a signed swap transaction from getOrder and returns execution status, distinguishing it from other Jupiter tools like jupiter_swap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage (after getOrder) but no explicit when-to-use or exclusion guidance. Sibling tools include multiple swap variants, so more clarity would help.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.