jupiter_executeDCA

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only says 'submit a signed transaction' without mentioning destructive potential, required permissions, or side effects. Minimal transparency beyond the obvious write operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, 9 words, no redundancy. Front-loaded with the main purpose. Every word contributes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., transaction signature, confirmation status). Also unclear if submission is asynchronous or synchronous.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters have schema descriptions that are already informative. The overall description adds context by linking requestId to createDCA response, but does not add new information beyond schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool submits a signed DCA order creation/cancellation transaction, identifying the specific resource (DCA order) and action (submit). It distinguishes from siblings like jupiter_createDCA and jupiter_cancelDCA, but could be more explicit about the dual purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., jupiter_createDCA, jupiter_cancelDCA, or jupiter_executeOrder). Missing prerequisites like having a requestId from createDCA.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.