browser.list_sessions
List live and persisted browser sessions to view and manage automation state.
Instructions
List live and persisted browser sessions.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List live and persisted browser sessions to view and manage automation state.
List live and persisted browser sessions.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and idempotentHint=true, so the description does not need to reiterate. It adds the scope 'live and persisted,' but no further behavioral details beyond what annotations cover.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words or repetitions.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple listing tool with no output schema, the description is complete enough to convey the basic purpose. It does not specify the return format, but that is often inferred.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so the description does not need to explain parameters. Baseline score of 4 for zero-parameter tools is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool lists browser sessions, specifying both live and persisted sessions. It distinguishes from siblings like browser.create_session and browser.close_session by focusing on listing.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use this tool (to get a list of sessions), but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or alternatives. However, given the simple nature of the tool, it is sufficient.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LvcidPsyche/auto-browser'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server