browser.close_session
Close an active browser session to finalize traces and artifacts for cleanup or analysis.
Instructions
Close a session and finalize its trace/artifacts.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Close an active browser session to finalize traces and artifacts for cleanup or analysis.
Close a session and finalize its trace/artifacts.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions closing and finalizing trace/artifacts, but does not specify if the action is irreversible, requires permissions, or affects other resources.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that conveys the core action. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could include a bit more detail without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple close operation with one parameter, the description covers the basic action. However, it lacks details on the effect of closing, whether it is synchronous, and what happens to artifacts. An output schema is absent, but given the simplicity, completeness is adequate but not exemplary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter with zero description coverage, and the tool description adds no additional meaning about the 'session_id' parameter. The description fails to explain what a valid session_id looks like or how to obtain it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the purpose: closing a session and finalizing its trace/artifacts. The verb 'Close' is specific and the resource 'session' is identified, distinguishing it from sibling tools like create_session or list_sessions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as close_tab or stop_trace. Usage is implied for ending a session, but no exclusions or prerequisites are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LvcidPsyche/auto-browser'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server