Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Auto-Browser

  • -
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    This server provides cloud browser automation capabilities using Browserbase, Puppeteer, and Stagehand. This server enables LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, and execute JavaScript in a cloud browser environment.
    1,158 npm
    3,397
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables LLMs like Claude to navigate the web through Puppeteer-based tools and Steel. Based on the Web Voyager framework, it provides tools for all the standard web actions click clicking/scrolling/typing/etc and taking screenshots.
    16
    58
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration that provides Claude Desktop with autonomous browser automation capabilities. This agent enables Claude to interact with web content, manipulate DOM elements, execute JavaScript, and perform API requests.
    13
    24 npm
    43
    TypeScript
    Mozilla Public 2.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables LLM clients to drive browsers, Windows desktop apps, and Office files through a unified action contract, with YAML-defined workflows, policy gates for irreversible actions, audit logging, and resumable human-approved runs.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables an AI agent to learn a Chromium browser task once and then replay it deterministically without spending LLM tokens, handing off logins and CAPTCHAs to a human while keeping credentials out of the model. Every step is de-identified for privacy and written to a hash-chained audit log, available as both an MCP server and a CLI.
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Lets coding agents drive a real headful Chromium over CDP on a remote headless box, giving each project its own persistent profile, isolated login sessions, downloads, and on-demand browser lifecycle. When a site needs a human for sign-in, a captcha, 2FA, or a passkey, the operator opens the same browser from their own machine, completes the step, and hands control back to the agent.
    Functional Source , Version 1.1, ALv2 Future
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to perform human-authorized, fully auditable GUI actions — clicking, typing, and window operations — on a local Windows desktop, gated by time- and count-limited leases that are denied by default until a person signs off in a popup. Every action is bound to a fresh screen capture, leaves screenshot-based evidence and decision logs on the local machine, and can be halted instantly via a panel button, hotkey, or kill-switch file.
    2
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Give your AI agents a real Chrome on your own Linux server. Connect through MCP or REST, watch live, take over for login and 2FA, then hand control back. Keep encrypted saved sessions, upload files and receive downloads. Open source under AGPL-3.0, with no usage fees; you provide the server.
    71
    AGPL 3.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 20 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct resource/action targets, and descriptions clarify when to use observe, get_html, find_elements, or screenshot. There is still some overlap around page observation and screenshots, since observe can return screenshot-only output while screenshot also captures the viewport.

Naming Consistency4/5

The tool set is consistently snake_case under the browser namespace, mostly following verb_noun patterns like create_session, list_tabs, and save_auth_profile. A few names such as observe and screenshot are shorter verb/noun forms rather than strict verb_noun, but the convention remains readable and predictable.

Tool Count4/5

Twenty tools is somewhat heavy but justified for a full browser automation server covering sessions, tabs, actions, observation, downloads, and auth profiles. Each tool has a plausible role, though the surface is near the upper end of what an agent can comfortably navigate.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers core browser automation lifecycle operations well: sessions, tabs, actions, observation, downloads, JS evaluation, and human takeover. There are minor gaps around auth-profile lifecycle, such as no obvious delete/update or explicit load operation, and tab creation is not directly exposed as its own tool.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessUsually handled