browser.get_session
Retrieve a summary of a browser session by providing its session ID.
Instructions
Get one browser session summary.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Retrieve a summary of a browser session by providing its session ID.
Get one browser session summary.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already declare read-only, non-destructive, idempotent, and open-world behavior. The description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., what 'summary' includes, or any side effects), so it provides no value beyond the structured annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence) and to the point, but it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity. It is concise but insufficiently informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity of the tool's context (many siblings, no output schema, minimal parameter guidance), the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain how to get a session ID, what the summary contains, or how this tool differs from similar ones.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero description coverage for its single parameter 'session_id'. The description does not explain what the parameter is, where to obtain a session ID, or any format expectations, leaving the agent without essential guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get') and the resource ('one browser session summary'), which directly conveys the tool's purpose. However, it does not differentiate this from siblings like 'browser.list_sessions' or 'browser.get_console', which similarly retrieve session-related data.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it mention any prerequisites or exclusion criteria for using the tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LvcidPsyche/auto-browser'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server