dismiss_recommendation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It mentions the lack of validate_only support and preview behavior, but omits critical details such as whether dismissal is irreversible, required permissions, or response format for a successful dismiss.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two focused sentences plus a note, all front-loaded with the primary purpose. Every element serves a purpose without redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has an output schema (not shown) and 100% parameter coverage, the description covers the core functionality and preview behavior. However, it lacks context about irreversible actions, permissions, or error handling, leaving gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description minimally adds to the parameter descriptions by restating the confirm parameter's effect (preview vs. dismiss) and the note about validate_only, which is helpful but not substantial beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Dismiss a recommendation (mark as not applicable)', which is a specific verb-resource combination. It distinguishes from sibling 'apply_recommendation', which applies instead of dismissing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for dismissing recommendations and notes that preview is supported with a return of intent. However, it does not explicitly state when to use versus alternatives like 'apply_recommendation'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.