remove_block_property
Remove a specific property from a Logseq block by supplying its UUID and the property key.
Instructions
Remove a block property.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| block_uuid | Yes | ||
| key | Yes |
Remove a specific property from a Logseq block by supplying its UUID and the property key.
Remove a block property.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| block_uuid | Yes | ||
| key | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It states 'Remove' but does not disclose if the operation is reversible, what happens if the property or block does not exist, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short, but it is under-specified and does not earn its place. It essentially restates the tool name without adding useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no annotations, no output schema, and two parameters with no descriptions, the description is insufficient to guide correct usage. It lacks clarity on parameter meanings and behavioral context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage for its two required parameters (block_uuid and key). The description does not explain what these parameters represent or how they should be used, providing no added value beyond the schema names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Remove a block property,' which is a specific verb+resource. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'remove_property' or 'remove_block_tag', which also remove properties or tags from blocks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'remove_property' or 'remove_block_property' (if any distinction exists). The description lacks any usage context or conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server