open_asset
Opens an asset at a specified path in Logseq using its built-in opener.
Instructions
Ask Logseq to open an asset path with its built-in opener.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
Opens an asset at a specified path in Logseq using its built-in opener.
Ask Logseq to open an asset path with its built-in opener.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only mentions 'built-in opener' but does not disclose potential side effects, failure modes, or whether it executes external processes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, but lacks any additional structure or detail; it is concise but at the expense of necessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no annotations, no output schema, and 0% param coverage, the description fails to provide sufficient context for reliable tool usage; missing return info, error handling, and path specification.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage and the tool description does not explain the 'path' parameter beyond its name; no hint on format, relative/absolute, or allowed values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (open) and resource (asset path) with built-in opener, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like make_asset_url or list_asset_files.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No description of when to use this tool versus alternatives; no context on prerequisites or expected outcomes.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server