prepend_block_in_page
Add a new block at the top of a Logseq page. Specify the target page and the block content.
Instructions
Prepend a block to a page.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes | ||
| content | Yes | ||
| properties | No |
Add a new block at the top of a Logseq page. Specify the target page and the block content.
Prepend a block to a page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes | ||
| content | Yes | ||
| properties | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the action. It does not disclose side effects, how prepending affects block order, or any constraints. Minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise but excessively minimal. It lacks necessary detail and structure to effectively guide an AI agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide essential context about behavior, return values, or preconditions. It is severely incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of 'page_name', 'content', or 'properties'. Parameters are left undefined, forcing reliance on schema names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'prepend' and the resource 'block to a page', distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'append_block_in_page' which does the opposite operation.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'append_block_in_page', 'insert_block', or 'update_block'. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as the page needing to exist.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server