get_page_properties
Fetch the properties of a Logseq page by providing its page name, returning metadata and attributes.
Instructions
Fetch properties for a page.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes |
Fetch the properties of a Logseq page by providing its page name, returning metadata and attributes.
Fetch properties for a page.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states 'Fetch' implying a read operation but lacks details about permissions, side effects, or what constitutes 'properties'.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise but lacks necessary detail. It serves as a minimal placeholder.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the low complexity with one parameter and no output schema, the description still fails to explain what the tool returns or how it behaves. Incomplete for effective usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning to the single parameter 'page_name' beyond the schema's type 'string'. No example, format, or elaboration.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description says 'Fetch properties for a page.' which is a clear verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_block_properties or get_all_properties.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description is minimal and provides no context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server