get_page_blocks_tree
Retrieve the hierarchical block tree of a Logseq page by providing its page name.
Instructions
Fetch a page's block tree by page name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes |
Retrieve the hierarchical block tree of a Logseq page by providing its page name.
Fetch a page's block tree by page name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, pagination, error handling, or performance implications. It only states the action without additional transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that is concise and front-loaded with the core action. Every word is necessary.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and a simple parameter, the description is too brief. It does not explain what a block tree is, return format, or behavior for missing pages, leaving gaps for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds some value by clarifying that the 'page_name' parameter specifies the name of the page whose block tree to fetch. However, it does not provide validation rules or expected format.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses the specific verb 'Fetch' and clearly identifies the resource as 'a page's block tree'. It distinguishes by parameter 'by page name', though it does not explicitly contrast with the sibling tool 'get_current_page_blocks_tree'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Given many sibling tools like 'get_current_page_blocks_tree', 'get_page', or 'get_current_page', explicit usage context is needed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server