get_tag_objects
Fetch all objects tagged with a specified tag. Provide the tag name or identifier to retrieve its associated items.
Instructions
Fetch objects tagged by a tag.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name_or_ident | Yes |
Fetch all objects tagged with a specified tag. Provide the tag name or identifier to retrieve its associated items.
Fetch objects tagged by a tag.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name_or_ident | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether results are paginated, the return format, or if it only fetches direct objects. The tool appears to be a read operation but lacks detail.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it is too concise to be helpful, lacking details that could be added without verbosity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple schema (one param) and no output schema, the description should provide more context about what the tool returns and how the parameter works. It is incomplete for safe and effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has a single parameter 'name_or_ident' with no description. The tool description does not explain what this parameter expects (e.g., tag name, ID, or both). With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to add meaningful semantic value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the verb 'Fetch' and the resource 'objects tagged by a tag', clearly indicating the tool's purpose. It distinguishes from siblings like 'get_tag' which likely returns tag metadata, but it could specify the type of objects (e.g., blocks or pages).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'get_all_tags' or 'get_tag'). There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server