add_tag_property
Assign a property to a tag in Logseq, enabling structured data and metadata management.
Instructions
Add a property to a tag.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tag_id | Yes | ||
| property_id_or_name | Yes |
Assign a property to a tag in Logseq, enabling structured data and metadata management.
Add a property to a tag.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tag_id | Yes | ||
| property_id_or_name | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry burden. Only states 'add a property to a tag' without disclosing what happens if the property already exists, return values, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks necessary details; it's more under-specification than conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and minimal description, the tool definition is incomplete. Missing info on prerequisites, behavior, and return values.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. Description adds no explanation for parameters. 'property_id_or_name' is ambiguous; it's unclear whether an ID or name is expected and how they differ.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action: adding a property to a tag. The verb 'add' and noun 'property' and 'tag' are specific. It distinguishes from siblings like remove_tag_property.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., tag must exist, property must exist) or when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Johnsonxd4/mcp-logseq'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server