create_screw_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond this. It does not mention whether the tool creates a new object, modifies an existing one, or what side effects (e.g., overwriting) might occur. The description is purely functional and provides no additional transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded, but it is under-specified for a tool with six parameters. While it avoids fluff, its brevity comes at the cost of necessary detail, making it less 'appropriately sized' than it should be. The single sentence does not earn its place by providing clarity beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having a complex profile array parameter and no parameter descriptions, the description offers no information about the input structure, default behavior, or expected output. The output schema exists but is not described. The tool is fundamentally incomplete from a contextual standpoint, leaving the agent unable to correctly select or invoke it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention any of the six parameters. The meaning of 'profile', 'steps', 'angle', 'axis', etc., is not explained. The description completely fails to compensate for the lack of parameter documentation, leaving the agent without guidance on how to construct valid arguments.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies a screw-profile creation operation around an axis, using the verb 'Lathe/screw' and resource 'kurva profil'. It distinguishes itself from generic curve or object creation tools in the sibling list, though the phrasing is slightly ambiguous (could be interpreted as a noun or verb).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_curve or model_from_scratch. The description only states what it does, not the context or prerequisites. There are no explicit exclusions or alternative suggestions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.