animate_from_scratch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false), the description discloses that old animation is cleaned first, which is specific destructive behavior. It also states the scope (location/rotation) and that a frame range is set, providing transparency about what will be modified. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that is front-loaded with the main action (clean old animation) and then the new behavior. It contains no wasted words and is easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (9 parameters, destructive behavior, output schema), the description is minimal. It conveys the core behavior but lacks detail on parameter usage, return values, or edge cases. The output schema exists, so return format is covered, but parameter handling and special conditions are missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description needed to compensate by explaining parameter meanings. It only vaguely references 'location/rotation' and 'frame range', which map to some parameters (start_loc, end_loc, start_frame, end_frame) but does not explain any of the 9 parameters explicitly. The required object_name is not mentioned at all.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: it cleans old animation and creates new location/rotation movement with a frame range. The verb 'Bersihkan' (clean) and 'buat' (create) specify the action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like animate_location or animate_rotation which only animate without resetting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: use this tool when you want to discard existing animation and start fresh. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use it over alternatives, nor does it provide exclusions or prerequisites. The context is clear but not fully explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.