batch_rename

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, so the agent knows it's a destructive operation. The description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., scope, reversibility, or side effects) but also doesn't contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the action and key modes. It contains zero redundant words, making it efficient, though it sacrifices important details for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the destructive nature, 4 optional parameters, and no schema descriptions, the description is incomplete. It lacks scope (all objects vs selected), mode interaction details, and cautionary guidance. The presence of an output schema does not compensate for the missing operational semantics.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description attempts to explain the two parameter modes (prefix+index and search/replace), which maps loosely to the parameters. However, it doesn't clarify how parameters combine, which mode takes precedence, or what start_index does beyond its name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Ganti nama' – rename) and resource ('objek' – objects), and distinguishes the two naming modes (prefix+index or search/replace). It's clear but doesn't explicitly mention 'batch' scope or differentiate from rename_bone beyond saying 'objects'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives like rename_bone or other batch operations. There are no usage context hints, exclusions, or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.