Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a complex mutation tool with 1 parameter (but deeply nested structure), 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is severely inadequate. It doesn't address parameter semantics, behavioral traits, error handling, or output expectations, leaving significant gaps for agent understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.