dynadot_set_domain_push_request

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It fails to mention key aspects such as whether the domain must be unlocked (despite an unlockDomainForPush parameter), potential side effects, or required permissions. The description only states the high-level action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary detail. It is not structured to highlight critical information; the brevity results in under-specification rather than efficient communication.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not cover return values, side effects, or prerequisites. The tool has 5 parameters and 2 required, but the description provides no context for how to use them effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 40% (2 out of 5 parameters have descriptions). The tool description does not add any parameter semantics beyond what is in the schema. It does not explain the purpose of currency or unlockDomainForPush, leaving ambiguity for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'push' and explicitly states the resource ('a domain to another Dynadot account'). It clearly indicates the tool's primary function. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool dynadot_authorize_transfer_away, which could be confused for a similar operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs. alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites (e.g., domain unlocked) or limitations. It simply states the action without context for an AI agent to decide appropriateness.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.