dynadot_get_open_backorder_auctions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It only mentions listing and access requirements, but does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, pagination behavior, or response format. This is insufficient for a tool with no structured metadata.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with one clear sentence and a necessary note. Every word is functional, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite low complexity (2 optional params, no output schema), the description lacks parameter explanations and behavioral details. It provides minimal actionable context for an AI agent to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the two optional parameters (pageIndex, countPerPage). The agent receives no guidance on how to use these parameters for pagination, which is critical for listing tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists active backorder auctions, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like dynadot_get_closed_backorder_auctions and dynadot_get_open_auctions by specifying 'backorder' and 'active'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The note about requiring auction-API access provides a prerequisite but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like dynadot_get_open_auctions or dynadot_get_backorder_auction_details. The context is implied by the name but not articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.