dynadot_set_default_stealth

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present. The single sentence does not disclose side effects, prerequisites (e.g., required account permissions), or whether it overrides existing defaults. The behavior is minimally described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise (one sentence), which is efficient, but it lacks necessary detail. It is front-loaded but could be expanded without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, no annotations, and only two parameters, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what 'stealth forwarding' entails, the effect on existing domains, or the response format. Sibling tools with similar functionality raise the need for clear differentiation, which is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description must add meaning. It does not describe the format or constraints for stealthUrl (required) or stealthTitle (optional). The tool name hints at a URL and title, but no additional guidance is given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'set' and resource 'default stealth forwarding' for new domains. It distinguishes from sibling set_default_* and set_stealth_forwarding tools by specifying 'default' and 'new domains'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies it's for setting defaults for future domains, but it does not explicitly state when to use this vs. alternatives like set_stealth_forwarding (for specific domains) or set_folder_stealth (for folders). No usage context or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.