dynadot_get_listings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the tool is a read operation (browse) and that it returns public listings only, not user-owned. However, it does not describe the response format, pagination details (e.g., total count), or any potential rate limits or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using two sentences to convey the core purpose, scope, and required parameters. It is front-loaded with the most important information and avoids unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks essential details about the output, such as the format of the listing data or pagination metadata. For a browsing tool, knowing whether the response includes total pages or how to iterate is crucial. No output schema is provided, so the description should compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Both parameters (countPerPage and pageIndex) are fully described in the input schema with clear descriptions. The tool description reiterates they are required and mentions pageIndex is zero-indexed, adding minimal value. With 100% schema coverage, the description does not significantly enhance parameter understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool browses public Dynadot marketplace listings with pagination. It distinguishes itself from personal listings by explicitly saying 'not your own' and contrasts with a dashboard alternative. The verb 'browse' and resource 'public marketplace listings' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context on when to use this tool (to browse public listings) and when not to use it (for own listings, use dashboard). It also emphasizes the required parameters. However, it does not explicitly state alternatives among sibling tools or conditions to avoid.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.