dynadot_set_clear_folder_setting

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description implies a mutation (reset), but no annotations are provided to confirm destructive behavior. It does not disclose prerequisites, consequences, or return values. The one-sentence description adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, but it lacks structure and fails to convey necessary information. It is under-specified rather than concisely informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and schema descriptions, the description is severely incomplete. A tool with two required parameters and vague behavior requires much more detail to be usable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the two parameters. 'folderId' and 'service' are undefined; notably, 'service' is critical for knowing what setting to reset. The agent has no way to determine valid values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Reset a specific setting on all domains in a folder,' which is vague. The verb 'reset' is somewhat specific, but 'specific setting' is unclear, and the tool name itself is ambiguous (set vs clear). It fails to distinguish from many sibling tools like dynadot_set_folder_dns or dynadot_set_clear_default_setting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With numerous sibling tools for folder settings, the lack of any usage context or exclusions leaves the agent without direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.