dynadot_account_info
Access your Dynadot account profile and settings to view and manage account details.
Instructions
Get account profile and settings.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Access your Dynadot account profile and settings to view and manage account details.
Get account profile and settings.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description only indicates a read operation via 'Get', but lacks details on behavioral traits like idempotency, safety, or authentication requirements, especially given no annotations are provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (3 words), front-loaded with the verb, but could be slightly more informative without losing brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should clarify what 'account profile and settings' covers; it is vague and incomplete for contextual understanding.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With zero parameters, schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no param info, but the baseline for 0 params is 4. The description hints at the output scope ('profile and settings'), which adds slight value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'Get' and clearly identifies the resource as 'account profile and settings', which distinguishes it from siblings like dynadot_get_account_balance or dynadot_get_order_status.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to prefer it over dynadot_get_account_balance or other account-related tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Eyalm321/dynadot-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server