dynadot_delete_folder
Delete a domain folder by providing its folder ID.
Instructions
Delete a folder.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| folderId | Yes |
Delete a domain folder by providing its folder ID.
Delete a folder.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| folderId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose whether deletion is permanent, cascading, or requires the folder to be empty.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely short but lacks essential detail, making it under-informative rather than concise; it fails to earn its place by missing critical usage context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-parameter tool with no output schema and many siblings, the description omits necessary information such as folder identification method and deletion scope, rendering it incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides no description for 'folderId', and the description does not explain its purpose, source, or format, leaving the agent without necessary context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a folder.' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (folder), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create or list folders.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites (e.g., folder must exist), or alternatives like dynadot_clear_domain_setting for unbinding domains.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Eyalm321/dynadot-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server