save_current_scene
Save the current scene in the Godot editor to preserve all changes.
Instructions
Save the current scene
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Save the current scene in the Godot editor to preserve all changes.
Save the current scene
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must carry the full behavioral burden. It only says 'save', but gives no details on whether it overwrites files, requires confirmation, or has side effects. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, zero wasted words. Information is front-loaded and efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no params, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is too minimal. It fails to explain what 'save' entails (e.g., disk vs memory) or when to prefer this over similar tools.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter details, but none are needed. Baseline of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb+resource ('save the current scene') and is specific. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like create_scene or play_current_scene, but the purpose is still unambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as play_current_scene or open_scene. No mention of prerequisites or consequences, leaving the agent without decision context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/DC925928496/AI-godot-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server