Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'batch' but doesn't explain the 'inputs' parameter structure, required fields (like 'properties'), or the meaning of nested properties (e.g., 'name', 'price', 'sku'). The description adds minimal value beyond the schema's structural hints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.