gitee_get_notification
Retrieve a single notification thread by its ID to view or manage its details.
Instructions
Get a single notification thread
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID |
Retrieve a single notification thread by its ID to view or manage its details.
Get a single notification thread
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description only says 'Get', implying read-only, but does not disclose whether it marks the notification as read, requires authentication, or returns any specific fields.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, front-loaded with key information, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimal description for a simple tool, but missing output schema and behavioral details. Given the many notification-related siblings, a bit more context would help.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% (parameter 'id' described as 'Notification ID'). The description adds no additional semantic value beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a single notification thread' clearly states the verb and resource, and it distinguishes from siblings like gitee_list_notifications (list multiple) and gitee_get_notification_count (count).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., list_notifications, get_notification_count). The agent must infer from the name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CainDez/mcp-gitee'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server