gitee_follow_user
Follow a Gitee user by providing their username to establish a follow connection.
Instructions
Follow a user
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes | Username to follow |
Follow a Gitee user by providing their username to establish a follow connection.
Follow a user
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes | Username to follow |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose side effects, auth requirements, or rate limits. It only states 'Follow a user' without any behavioral details beyond the action itself.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is minimal (3 words) with no wasted text. It is concise, though could benefit from slight expansion for context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so the description should explain the return value. It does not. Combined with minimal behavioral info, the tool's usage context is incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one required parameter 'username' clearly described. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Follow a user' clearly states the action (follow) and the resource (user). It distinguishes from sibling tools like unfollow, check following, etc., but does not explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as prerequisites (e.g., user must exist) or whether the action requires authentication.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CainDez/mcp-gitee'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server