gitee_create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks behavioral details such as permission requirements, side effects, or response behavior. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries full burden but fails to disclose important traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two words) but lacks structure and meaningful content. It is front-loaded but does not provide substantive information beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool complexity (10 parameters, no annotations or output schema), the description is insufficient. It does not explain the purpose of a webhook, event triggers, or typical usage context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are fully described in the schema. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, warranting a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a webhook' clearly identifies the action and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools like update_webhook, delete_webhook, etc. It is specific but does not elaborate on scope (e.g., repository webhook).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_webhook or test_webhook. There is no mention of prerequisites or typical scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.