gitee_get_key
Retrieve a specific public SSH key using its unique key ID from Gitee user settings.
Instructions
Get a public SSH key
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Key ID |
Retrieve a specific public SSH key using its unique key ID from Gitee user settings.
Get a public SSH key
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Key ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention read-only nature, authentication needs, or error handling (e.g., key not found). Only the action is stated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with no unnecessary words. However, it may be overly terse, lacking context that could improve usability without much added length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description does not explain return values or error scenarios. For a retrieval tool, details on what is returned (e.g., key content, type) are missing. The low complexity partially mitigates this, but completeness is still lacking.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single parameter 'id' described as 'Key ID'. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a public SSH key' clearly states the action and resource. It is specific to retrieving a single key, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like gitee_list_my_keys or gitee_list_available_keys.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives for listing or retrieving keys. The description lacks context on prerequisites or when to choose this over other tools.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CainDez/mcp-gitee'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server