gitee_get_gist_comment
Retrieve a specific comment from a Gist by providing the Gist ID and comment ID.
Instructions
Get a gist comment
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gist_id | Yes | Gist ID | |
| id | Yes | Comment ID |
Retrieve a specific comment from a Gist by providing the Gist ID and comment ID.
Get a gist comment
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gist_id | Yes | Gist ID | |
| id | Yes | Comment ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only says 'Get', implying read-only. It lacks details on return format, authentication needs, or potential errors.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is overly terse; while concise, it omits context that would help an agent, such as clarifying it retrieves a single comment by ID.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description adequately conveys the basic operation but fails to differentiate from similar tools like list_gist_comments or mention any output structure, given no output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters ('Gist ID', 'Comment ID'), but the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get a gist comment' clearly states the action (get) and the resource (gist comment), distinguishing it from siblings like create, list, update, and delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided; it does not specify when to use this tool vs listing all comments or other alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or constraints.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/CainDez/mcp-gitee'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server