gitee_get_branch

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only indicates a read operation ('Get'), but does not mention authentication needs, rate limits, behavior on missing branch, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (3 words) and front-loaded. Every word is necessary, but a slightly more informative concise phrase (e.g., 'Get a branch from a repository') would improve clarity while remaining concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of an output schema and the presence of many sibling tools (e.g., gitee_get_commit, gitee_list_branches, gitee_get_pull), the description is insufficient. It does not explain the return value, error conditions, or how this tool fits with others.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the input schema already documents each parameter (owner, repo, branch) with descriptions. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what is in the schema, resulting in a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a branch' clearly states the verb (Get) and resource (branch), distinguishing it from sibling tools like gitee_create_branch or gitee_list_branches. However, it could be more precise, e.g., specifying 'details of a specific branch in a repository'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like gitee_get_commit, gitee_list_branches, or gitee_get_pull. The description lacks context about prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.