gitee_create_week_report

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. However, it only states 'Create a week report' without indicating any side effects, permissions, or error conditions. This omission leaves the agent uninformed about important behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at 4 words, but it lacks structure and adds minimal value beyond restating the tool name. While brevity is appreciated, the content is too sparse to be considered effective for an AI agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that the tool has 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is critically incomplete. It fails to explain what a week report is, how dates work, or the expected format of content, leaving the agent with insufficient context to use the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 4 parameters, so the schema already provides adequate definitions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema offers, achieving the baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Create a week report,' which clearly identifies the action (create) and the resource (week report). It implicitly distinguishes from sibling tools like gitee_update_week_report and gitee_get_week_report, though it provides no additional context about the tool's scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., gitee_update_week_report for modifications), nor does it specify prerequisites or context such as the need for an enterprise.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.