wrike_launch_blueprint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It states the outcome (create a project from template) but does not mention permissions, side effects, reversibility, return format, or potential errors. For a mutation tool, this is a significant gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It communicates the essential action and result efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is relatively simple with three parameters and no output schema. The description gives the core purpose, but it does not explain what the response contains, whether the operation is synchronous, or any required permissions. Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description could do more to fully contextualize the behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter is already described in the schema. The description adds little beyond what the schema provides, but it does convey that the blueprint serves as a template, which aligns with the parameter semantics. The baseline of 3 applies because the schema handles parameter documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb+resource: 'Launch a blueprint to create a project from template.' This clearly distinguishes it from siblings like wrike_create_project (direct creation) and wrike_get_blueprint (retrieval).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The intended use is implied: when you have a blueprint ID and a parent folder ID and want to create a project from that template. However, there is no explicit mention of when to use this versus alternatives like wrike_create_project, and no exclusions or prerequisites beyond the required parameters.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.