wrike_create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It says nothing about permissions, side effects, whether the webhook becomes active immediately, or what the response looks like. The description merely restates the action without any behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, but it is under-specified rather than effectively concise. It adds no value beyond the tool name, omitting essential details that an agent needs, so the brevity is not beneficial.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation tool with three parameters and no output schema, this description is incomplete. It doesn't explain the relationship between hookUrl and taskId/folderId, nor what to expect on success. Without annotations, the context is insufficient for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, meaning each parameter (taskId, hookUrl, folderId) already has a description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new webhook' clearly states the action (create) and the resource (webhook), distinguishing it from sibling operations like wrike_list_webhooks, wrike_update_webhook, and wrike_delete_webhook. However, it lacks detail on what a webhook is or what resources can be watched, so it's not fully explanatory.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The schema includes taskId and folderId but the description doesn't explain how to choose between them or mention any prerequisites or scenarios that call for creating a webhook.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.