wrike_create_space

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. 'Create a new space' only states the basic action; it does not mention side effects, permissions required, return values, or whether the operation is idempotent. This is a significant gap for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with zero wasted words. It is appropriately sized for the simplicity of the operation, and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite complete schema coverage, the description is incomplete for a create operation. It does not explain what happens after successful creation (e.g., does it return the created space?), any prerequisites (e.g., required permissions), or how errors are surfaced. While the purpose is clear, the lack of behavioral and outcome context leaves the agent under-informed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all four parameters (title, members, accessType, description), so the schema already documents parameter semantics. The description adds no additional parameter-level information, which is acceptable given the high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a new space' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing this tool from siblings like wrike_get_space, wrike_update_space, wrike_delete_space, and wrike_list_spaces. It unambiguously states the action and target.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when a new space needs to be created, but it provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update for existing spaces). No exclusions or alternative tool references are given, so the guidance is only implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.