Skip to main content
Glama
BusyBee3333

Wrike MCP Server

by BusyBee3333
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Wrike MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ClickUp MCP Server

      BusyBee3333
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Complete Model Context Protocol server for ClickUp, enabling interaction with tasks, spaces, lists, docs, goals, time tracking, and more through 93 tools and 18 React MCP apps.
      -

    • Weeek MCP Server

      AlekMel
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Full-featured MCP server integrating all 71 endpoints of the Weeek API as MCP tools for AI clients, enabling task, project, and workspace management via natural language.
      3
      -

    • Zendesk MCP Server

      BusyBee3333
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server providing 89 tools and 13 React UI apps for complete Zendesk Support API integration, enabling ticket, user, organization, and automation management.
      -

    • Mailchimp MCP Server

      BusyBee3333
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Comprehensive MCP server for Mailchimp Marketing API v3.0 with over 104 tools and 15+ React UI apps, enabling management of campaigns, audiences, ecommerce, automations, reports, and more via natural language.
      100
      1
      -

    • MCP Setup Server

      lakshmidevi2016
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A modular MCP server exposing tools for integrating with services like GitHub, Redash, Jenkins, Figma, Jira, Confluence, Teams, Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, and Presto, enabling users to manage these platforms through natural language via an MCP client.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 88 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools follow a clear resource+action pattern, but there is some overlap between wrike_list_tasks and wrike_search_tasks, and between wrike_get_attachment, wrike_download_attachment, wrike_get_attachment_url, and wrike_get_attachment_preview, which could cause confusion about which tool to use.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use the wrike_ prefix followed by a consistent verb_noun convention (e.g., list_tasks, get_task, create_comment, delete_folder). The naming pattern is highly predictable and uniform throughout, with no mixed styles or arbitrary verb choices.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 88 tools, the server is significantly over-scoped, well beyond the typical 3-15 range. While it attempts to cover a wide API surface, the sheer number makes it unwieldy and increases cognitive load on agents, fitting the 'too many (25+)' descriptor.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a broad range of Wrike resources (tasks, folders, comments, approvals, contacts, custom fields, etc.) with full CRUD for most. However, notable gaps exist: there is no tool to upload/create an attachment, and workflows lack a delete operation, leaving some lifecycle coverage incomplete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources