wrike_delete_comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Delete a comment' without mentioning that deletion is irreversible, whether permissions are required, or what happens to associated data. This leaves the agent without critical operational context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, front-loaded with the action, and free of unnecessary information. It is concise, though it could incorporate additional useful details without significant bloat, so it does not earn a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations and no output schema, the description should clarify the operation's effects, such as permanence, success/failure responses, or error conditions. The bare phrase 'Delete a comment' does not provide this, leaving the tool incomplete for an agent to anticipate outcomes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema defines commentId as a required string with description 'Comment ID (required)'. The tool description adds no further semantics about the parameter, such as format or how to obtain it. Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete a comment' clearly states the action (delete) and the resource (comment), distinguishing it from sibling tools like wrike_update_comment, wrike_get_comment, and wrike_create_comment. It is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as wrike_update_comment or wrike_get_comment. No prerequisites, exclusions, or usage context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.