ui_selected_channel
Returns the index and name of the currently selected channel in an FL Studio project.
Instructions
Return selected channel index + name.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Returns the index and name of the currently selected channel in an FL Studio project.
Return selected channel index + name.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It discloses return values but not whether it's a read-only operation, error conditions (e.g., no selection), or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, very concise, front-loaded with the action and output. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It covers the basic purpose but lacks detail on edge cases or behavioral context that would be helpful without annotations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has no parameters with 100% coverage, so baseline is 3. Description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it returns the selected channel index and name. The verb 'Return' and resource 'selected channel' are specific. However, it does not differentiate from similar sibling tools like 'channel_selected' or 'channel_info'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Implied use for querying the current selection, but no explicit when-not-to-use or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Boyan253/fl-studio-2025-ai-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server