playlist_solo_track
Solo or unsolo a specific playlist track by specifying the track index and optional solo state.
Instructions
Solo a playlist track.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| track | Yes | ||
| solo | No |
Solo or unsolo a specific playlist track by specifying the track index and optional solo state.
Solo a playlist track.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| track | Yes | ||
| solo | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description fails to disclose key behaviors: whether soloing toggles, unsolos others, or affects playback. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (one sentence) but sacrifices necessary detail. It is not overly verbose, but it fails to be informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the absence of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about the tool's effect and return value. It is incomplete for a simple but specific action.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description offers no explanation of the 'track' or 'solo' parameters. The agent must infer meaning from names alone.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Solo a playlist track' clearly indicates the verb (solo) and the resource (playlist track), distinguishing it from similar tools like channel_solo or mixer_solo. However, it does not elaborate on what 'solo' entails.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives such as playlist_mute_track or channel_solo. The agent has no context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Boyan253/fl-studio-2025-ai-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server