playlist_track_count
Counts the number of tracks in an FL Studio project's playlist to provide track usage data for project analysis and organization.
Instructions
Playlist track count.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Counts the number of tracks in an FL Studio project's playlist to provide track usage data for project analysis and organization.
Playlist track count.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It fails to disclose return type, side effects, or any behavioral traits. The description is essentially just the name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short at two words, but under-specified. Lacks critical information to be usefully concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters and no output schema, the description should at least clarify the return value or scope. It fails to provide sufficient context for the agent.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema has zero parameters, so baseline is 4. However, the description adds no value beyond the schema or name; it doesn't explain what the count represents or return format. Adequate but minimal.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Playlist track count' clearly indicates the tool returns a count related to playlist tracks. It is distinct from siblings like playlist_all_tracks or playlist_track_info. However, it doesn't specify which playlist or scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives. No context provided about prerequisites or typical usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Boyan253/fl-studio-2025-ai-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server