gen_scale_notes
Generate MIDI notes for a scale run from a specified root, scale type, and number of octaves.
Instructions
Return MIDI notes for a scale run.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| root | No | C4 | |
| scale | No | minor | |
| octaves | No |
Generate MIDI notes for a scale run from a specified root, scale type, and number of octaves.
Return MIDI notes for a scale run.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| root | No | C4 | |
| scale | No | minor | |
| octaves | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, performance, or limitations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Overly terse. While it is concise, it lacks necessary detail and structure, failing to add value beyond the name.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and no parameter documentation. Does not describe return format or what 'MIDI notes' entails (list, range, etc.).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, and description does not explain any parameters. Only names are given; no additional meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it returns MIDI notes for a scale run. Distinguishes from sibling gen_chord_notes and gen_list_scales, but 'scale run' could be slightly ambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Boyan253/fl-studio-2025-ai-bridge'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server